KL Rahul’s dismissal during India’s first innings of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in Perth has sparked widespread debate, with former cricketers and experts questioning the accuracy of the DRS (Decision Review System) decision.
Rahul, who was batting on 26, was initially given not out by on-field umpire Richard Kettleborough after an appeal by Australian bowler Mitchell Starc. The Australians believed Rahul had edged the ball to wicketkeeper Alex Carey, prompting them to review the decision. However, the review was inconclusive.
The Snicko technology, which is used to detect faint edges, showed a slight spike as the ball passed the bat. But Rahul, visibly frustrated as he walked off, insisted the bat had hit the pad rather than the ball. Despite the uncertainty, third umpire Richard Illingworth asked Kettleborough to overturn his decision, leaving Rahul disappointed and India at 47 for 4.
Former cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar criticized the technology provided to the TV umpire, arguing that there wasn’t enough visual evidence to make such an important decision. “The TV umpire should have been given more angles. The only certainty we had was the bat hitting the pad. If there was a spike, it should have been clearer. This was a poor supply of technology,” Manjrekar said on Star Sports.
Former international umpire Simon Taufel also weighed in, suggesting that while the ball may have grazed Rahul’s edge, the confusion arose due to the bat potentially hitting the pad at the same time. “The ball does graze the outside edge, but then the bat hits the pad. This caused confusion,” Taufel explained on Channel Seven.
The controversial dismissal has left many questioning the reliability of technology in making such crucial decisions, especially given India’s challenging position in the match.
Also Read:- Rohit Sharma to Join India Squad in Australia on November 24
