Cricket Australia (CA) CEO Nick Hockley has defended the selectors’ decision to rest several key players during Australia’s series-deciding ODI loss to Pakistan in Perth. The move, which saw Test players such as Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc, Steven Smith, and Marnus Labuschagne sit out the third ODI, has sparked public criticism, with some questioning the timing given the 11-day gap before the first Test of the BGT 2024-25 in the same city.
Hockley explained that the decision was part of a long-term plan to ensure Australia’s best players are in optimal condition for a demanding summer, including a five-match Test series against India, followed by the Champions Trophy. The CA CEO emphasized that the workload management, particularly for fast bowlers, was critical to avoid injuries.
“The amount of planning and work that goes into squad selection and preparation across three formats is significant,” Hockley said. “For our Test players, ensuring they are fit for a grueling summer of cricket was a priority. With a packed schedule ahead, it was felt that resting the players during the third ODI was in the best interest of their long-term performance.”
Hockley also pointed to data from CA’s strength and conditioning and medical staff, who have shown that fast bowlers are at increased risk of injury if they don’t get adequate rest, especially when long flights are involved. This comes after Australia’s recent experiences in the UK, where multiple fast bowlers were sidelined by injuries, highlighting the need for careful workload management.
The decision was not taken lightly, according to Hockley, who said that even if the third ODI had been played in Sydney, it was unlikely the fast bowlers would have featured in all three matches. He also noted that the scheduling of ODIs, often driven by commercial considerations, doesn’t always allow for the ideal rest periods between matches.
Looking ahead, Hockley confirmed that CA is reviewing next summer’s schedule, including the white-ball series against India, to ensure players can be fielded more consistently in their best possible form. The tight turnaround between formats, combined with the demands of travel, has made it difficult to always field full-strength sides in every match.
“We will look closely at the travel schedule for the India series and beyond,” Hockley said. “The key takeaway from this series is that optimizing the schedule to ensure our best XI is consistently on the field is something we will focus on in our planning for next year.”
Despite the loss to Pakistan, Hockley believes there were positives to be taken from the series, particularly the opportunity to expose emerging players to international cricket. He acknowledged that the defeat was disappointing but reiterated that the decision to rest players was made with the broader goals of the summer in mind.
“This was a disappointing result, but it provided an opportunity to assess some of the talent coming through,” Hockley said. “Pakistan played very well, and we were not quite able to match their intensity, but we remain focused on our long-term objectives.”